Skip to content
Light Heavyweight
3 Rounds
Matt Hamill won · U-DEC R3
Elo1490
Elo1352

Matt HamillvsRoger HollettUFC Prediction Result

UFC 152: Jones vs Belfort · Saturday, September 22, 2012Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Official fight result

Matt Hamill won

U-DEC · Round 3 · 5:00

Model Prediction: Matt Hamill wins(72.4%)

Actual result: Matt Hamill wins · Model version: ufc_v6_2_pure_lightgbm_20260715_055615

Correct

Hypothetical $100 stake on the replay pick

Matt Hamill at -340 American odds

+$29 profit

$129 total returned

Scouting Report

Auto-generated signals worth knowing before you read the deep stats below.

  • Matt Hamill enters on a 3-fight losing streak.
  • Matt Hamill has 27pp better strike defense — meaningful gap.
  • Matt Hamill has 61pp better takedown defense — controls where the fight happens.
  • Matt Hamill has a 15cm reach advantage.

Tale of the Tape

Matt Hamill
Red Corner
VS
Roger Hollett
Blue Corner
-340
(77%)
Vegas Odds
+310
(24%)
1490
Elo
1352
49
Age
47
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
6'1"
Height
5'11"
193.04 cm
Reach
177.8 cm

Recent Form

Last 5 fights for each fighter — most recent on the right. Hover any result for the matchup.

Matt HamillL3 streak
oldest →
W
vs Keith Jardine · Jun 10
W
vs Tito Ortiz · Oct 10
L
DECvs Rampage Jackson · May 11
L
KOvs Alexander Gustafsson · Aug 11
L
vs Thiago Silva · Oct 13
latest
Roger Hollett
oldest →
L
vs Fabio Maldonado · May 13
latest

Output & Defense Comparison

Rate-normalized career statistics. Bold side has the edge per metric.

Matt HamillMetricRoger Hollett
3.69
Strikes / min
1.83
3.80
Strikes absorbed / min
6.47
61%
Strike defense
34%
3.00
TDs / 15 min
1.00
91%
Takedown defense
30%
0.00
Sub atts / 15 min
0.00
Net striking (SLpM − SApM)
-0.11Δ 4.53 — meaningful gap-4.64

Statistical Profile

Career averages · bigger area = stronger across dimensions

Elo1498 vs 1500Strikes31.3 vs Takedowns1.7 vs Sub Atts0.00 vs Form-0.4 vs 0.0
Matt HamillRoger Hollett

Recent Elo Trajectory

Last 10 fights for each fighter, aligned right (most recent on the right).

14901495150015051510← oldermost recent →
Matt Hamill(6 fights)Roger Hollett(2 fights)

Model Feature Differentials

Red − Blue for each engineered feature. Bar leans toward the stronger fighter.Hover a label to see what it measures.

ELO Rating
Red +138.1|Blue -138.1
Recent Form
Red -0.4|Blue +0.4
Striker Score
Red -48.0|Blue +48.0
Grappler Score
Red -49.7|Blue +49.7
Red Corner advantageBlue Corner advantage

Strike Breakdown

Where the strikes landed. Head accuracy is the single strongest predictor of fight outcomes.

Matt HamillTargetRoger Hollett

By target zone

86
65% acc · 91%
Head
9
21% acc · 35%
0
0% acc
Body
14
52% acc · 54%
8
73% acc · 9%
Leg
3
100% acc · 12%

By position

23
37% acc · 24%
Distance
25
35% acc · 96%
1
100% acc · 1%
Clinch
0
70
86% acc · 74%
Ground
1
100% acc · 4%

Round-by-Round Scoring (Model)

Statistical round-winner heuristic based on strikes, takedowns, control time, and knockdowns. Not the official judges' scorecard.

2
Matt Hamill rounds
1
even
0
Roger Hollett rounds
Round 1Matt Hamill edged it
Sig. strikes67
Takedowns1
Control1:25
8Sig. strikes
0Takedowns
0:00Control
Round 2Even round
Sig. strikes4
Takedowns2
Control0:57
13Sig. strikes
0Takedowns
0:00Control
Round 3Matt Hamill edged it
Sig. strikes23
Takedowns3
Control3:38
5Sig. strikes
0Takedowns
0:00Control
Statistical round count agrees with the official result.

Fight Stats

Totals

0
KD
0
94 / 144
Sig Strikes
26 / 72
55.7%
Sig Str %
35.3%
151 / 216
Total Strikes
32 / 79
6 / 8
TDs
0 / 0
80.3%
TD %
0
Sub Att
0
0
Rev
0
6:00
Ctrl Time
0:00

Round-by-Round

RoundFighterSig StrTotal StrTDSub
1Roger Hollett8 / 288 / 280 / 00
1Matt Hamill67 / 9685 / 1181 / 10
2Roger Hollett13 / 3016 / 340 / 00
2Matt Hamill4 / 1811 / 272 / 30
3Roger Hollett5 / 148 / 170 / 00
3Matt Hamill23 / 3055 / 713 / 40

Matt Hamill

StanceOrthodox
Height73.0"
Reach76.0"
Fights6

Roger Hollett

StanceOrthodox
Height71.0"
Reach
Fights2