Scouting Report
Auto-generated signals worth knowing before you read the deep stats below.
- Christina Marks has 19pp better strike defense — meaningful gap.
- Montana De La Rosa has 68pp better takedown defense — controls where the fight happens.
Recent Form
Last 5 fights for each fighter — most recent on the right. Hover any result for the matchup.
Christina MarksNo prior UFC fights on record.
Montana De La Rosa
oldest →W
KOvs Ariane Lipski · Jun 21L
vs Maycee Barber · Apr 22L
SUBvs Tatiana Suarez · Feb 23 Output & Defense Comparison
Rate-normalized career statistics. Bold side has the edge per metric.
Christina MarksMetricMontana De La Rosa
Net striking (SLpM − SApM)+2.00Δ 2.49 — meaningful gap-0.49
Not enough statistical data to render a radar chart for this matchup.
Recent Elo Trajectory
Last 10 fights for each fighter, aligned right (most recent on the right).
Christina Marks(1 fights)Montana De La Rosa(10 fights)
Model Feature Differentials
Red − Blue for each engineered feature. Bar leans toward the stronger fighter.Hover a label to see what it measures.
ELO Rating— Skill rating gap. Larger = bigger experience/performance gap between fighters.
Red -8.1|Blue +8.1
Recent Form— Weighted win-rate over recent fights. Positive = Red on hotter streak.
Red 0.0|Blue 0.0
Striker Score— Striking output & defense composite. Positive = Red has striking edge.
Red 0.0|Blue 0.0
Grappler Score— Takedown & submission composite. Positive = Red has grappling edge.
Red 0.0|Blue 0.0
Red Corner advantageBlue Corner advantage
Strike Breakdown
Where the strikes landed. Head accuracy is the single strongest predictor of fight outcomes.
Christina MarksTargetMontana De La Rosa
Round-by-Round Scoring (Model)
Statistical round-winner heuristic based on strikes, takedowns, control time, and knockdowns. Not the official judges' scorecard.
0
Montana De La Rosa rounds
Round 1Christina Marks edged it
Sig. strikes10
Takedowns1
Control0:41
6Sig. strikes
0Takedowns
0:25Control
Statistical round count disagrees with the official result — could indicate a contested decision or finish that doesn't follow round-count logic.
